• Extranet
  • Contact
  • Data Protection
  • Imprint
  • Deutsch
  • English

News

Max Planck Economics Podcast

We are pleased to announce the Max Planck Economics Podcast, a series of in-depth conversations...

More information

Mehr Brüssel oder mehr Berlin?

"Steuern und Sozialleistungen im Europa von morgen" ist das Thema einer öffentlichen...

More information

“Forschungspreis Soziale Marktwirtschaft: Third place for Marta Castelon”

Dr. Marta Castelon, a former research associate at the MPI for Tax Law and Public Finance, was...

More information

Leopoldo Parada Wins the Prestigious Sorbonne Tax Thesis Award

Dr. Leopoldo Paradas’s doctoral thesis entitled “Double Non-Taxation and the Use of Hybrid...

More information

Hostility towards minorities can be contagious

If people act hostile towards other ethnic groups, they easily find imitators.

More information

Events

Lecture  
Date: 10/16/2018 —02/05/2019 | 04:00:PM — 06:00:PM

Einkommenssteuerrecht

Speaker: Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Wolfgang Schön

More Information


Conference  
Date: 12/13/2018 —12/14/2018 | 08:00:AM — 06:00:PM

XXXII. Tax Day

More Information


All events
 
Archived events

Current Publications

Tim Lohse, Sven A. Simon, Kai A. Konrad

Deception Under Time Pressure: Conscious Decision or a Problem of Awareness?

If you want an honest reaction, you should put your counterpart under time pressure. Those, who have to react spontaneously, are more likely to speak the truth. Tim Lohse, Sven A. Simon and Kai A. Konrad conducted an experimental study and found that time is crucial for deceptive behaviour. Dishonest activities not only involve coping with the trade-off between the associated costs and benefits. It also takes time to become aware of the cheating opportunity. And the latest is the decisive factor: Whereas reflection time increases the chance to become aware of the misreporting opportunity and thus increases deceptive behaviour, the study finds that any time beyond the awareness moment has no effect on the conscious decision of whether to cheat or not. 

Published: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2018, 146, 31-42.

More information

Kai A. Konrad and Vai-Lam Mui

The Prince or Better No Prince – The Strategic Value of Appointing a Successor

Whether in a company, an institution, a political party or even in a criminal organisation, appointing a successor (the “prince”) can be advantageous for the ruler (“the king”) but can also entail threats and disadvantages. In a recent publication Kai A. Konrad and Vai-Lam Mui analyse if and when the appointment of a prince is in the interest of the incumbent and stabilises his regime.

Published: Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2017, 61(10), 2158-2182.

More information

Carsten Hohmann

Beschränkung des subjektbezogenen Verlusttransfers im Kapitalgesellschaftsteuerrecht

In seiner Dissertation setzt sich Dr. Carsten Hohmann mit einem brandaktuellen Thema auseinander, der Vorschrift zur Beschränkung des sog. subjektbezogenen Verlusttransfers gemäß § 8c KStG. Erst kürzlich hat das Bundesverfassungsgericht entschieden, dass §8c (Abs. 1) Satz 1 KStG partiell mit dem Grundgesetz unvereinbar ist. In seiner unlängst erschienenen Arbeit vergleicht Carsten Hohmann die entsprechenden Regime in Deutschland, Österreich, der Schweiz, dem Vereinigten Königreich und den USA und entwickelt einen eigenen, alternativen Regelungsvorschlag für eine Reform in Deutschland.

Published: Duncker & Humblot, 2017, 1009 Seiten.

More information

Thushyanthan Baskaran and Mariana Lopes da Fonseca

Electoral Thresholds and Political Representation

In a recent publication Thushyanthan Baskaran and Mariana Lopes da Fonseca study the effects of electoral thresholds on political representation, relying on a reform in the German federal state of Hesse that abolished a 5% threshold for local elections. Their results show that the reform had psychological effects that eventually improved the electoral prospects of (relatively small) local parties.

Published: Public Choice, 2016, 169(1), 117–136.

More information

Alexander Hellgardt

Regulierung und Privatrecht

The balancing of private interests has hitherto been seen as the primary task of private law. Alexander Hellgardt shows in his post-doctoral dissertation, recently published by Mohr Siebeck, that private law is better conceived of as a tool which the legislator may use to regulate economy or society. Hellgardt illustrates the regulatory function of private law using sales law and property law as main examples. He examines regulation by means of private law in order to pursue public interest goals and presents conclusions for jurisprudence, legislation and legal practice.

Published: Mohr Siebeck, 2016, XXXIV, 848 pages.

More information