FISCAL & SOCIAL STATE
Leadership by a "big-man" has been observed as a successful governance structure in several historical contexts with small groups. We illustrate this by way of examples and analyse this framework in the context of non-cooperative games with narrowly selfish players. We show how norms solve the distributional conflict inside a group and yield efficient coordination of collective action in a conflict with an external competitor. In the equilibrium one of the players assumes a central role that resembles the role of the "big-man" in the empirical examples. Also, the group members' contributions to collective output and the donations from the big-man to these members seemingly look like reciprocal behavior, even though they are driven by narrowly selfish preferences in a fully non-cooperative equilibrium of a multi-stage game.
Published: Public Choice, 2011, 146(3-4), pp. 501-520.
FISCAL & SOCIAL STATE